Top
Stories
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: Getting Them to Stay February 8, 2013
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: See Where Workers Are Saying 'See Ya' February 8, 2013
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: A Shrinking Pool of Job Candidates February 8, 2013
Featured Article Honoring Diversity the Hawaiian Way February 8, 2013
Featured Article Honoring Diversity the McDonald's Way February 8, 2013
Featured Article Defending Diversity February 8, 2013
Featured Article Retirement Showdown February 7, 2013
Featured Article Visa Program Sparks Debate—Again February 7, 2013
Featured Article Homeward Bound February 7, 2013
Blog: The Practical Employer Workplace Social Media Policies Must Account for Generational Issues February 7, 2013
Blog: Work in Progress Kiss and Tell February 6, 2013
Latest News

Black Workers, Applicants Allege Discrimination by Iowa

The lawsuit alleges disparate-impact or adverse-impact discrimination in hiring and promotions in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and state law.

  • Published: September 30, 2010
  • Updated: September 15, 2011
  • Comments (0)
Related Topics:

A state judge has granted class-action status to a lawsuit in which Iowa is accused of discriminating against black state workers and applicants.

The plaintiffs and the state both sought class-action certification.

In an order issued September 29, Judge Robert J. Blink ruled that the lawsuit brought by 32 current or former black state employees qualifies as a class action.

“The court finds that joint or common interest exists among members of this class, that common questions of law and/or fact predominate over any question affecting only individual members, that certification of this class offers the most appropriate means of adjudicating the class claim and defenses and that management of this class does not pose unusual difficulties,” Blink said in his order.

The lawsuit alleges disparate-impact or adverse-impact discrimination in hiring and promotions in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and state law.

Included in the class are blacks who applied for or were hired by the state since July 1, 2003. Plaintiff attorney Thomas Newkirk, of the Des Moines, Iowa-based Newkirk Law Offices, said the class could include several thousand individuals.

Plaintiffs allege in court papers that “racial bias in the state's hiring and promotion system—stemming in part from the state abandoning its affirmative-action obligations—creates hurdles in the form of shifting, subjective standards and known discriminatory selection criteria.” It says blacks “face astronomical odds of obtaining equal employment opportunities” that can result only from racial bias throughout Iowa's workforce.

The lawsuit seeks lost past and future wages, compensatory damages and attorney fees as well as efforts to prevent future discrimination.

A spokesman for the Iowa attorney general’s office, which has denied the allegations, said the class action “allows us to focus on the merits of the case” as opposed to defending numerous individual lawsuits.  

Filed by Judy Greenwald of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

 

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

Follow Workforce on Twitter
HR Jobs
View All Job Listings

Search