Top
Stories
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: Getting Them to Stay February 8, 2013
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: See Where Workers Are Saying 'See Ya' February 8, 2013
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: A Shrinking Pool of Job Candidates February 8, 2013
Featured Article Honoring Diversity the Hawaiian Way February 8, 2013
Featured Article Honoring Diversity the McDonald's Way February 8, 2013
Featured Article Defending Diversity February 8, 2013
Featured Article Retirement Showdown February 7, 2013
Featured Article Visa Program Sparks Debate—Again February 7, 2013
Featured Article Homeward Bound February 7, 2013
Blog: The Practical Employer Workplace Social Media Policies Must Account for Generational Issues February 7, 2013
Blog: Work in Progress Kiss and Tell February 6, 2013
Latest News

No Unemployment Insurance for Willful Misconduct

A lower court ruled that the employee was not entitled to reconsideration of the Employment Security Division Board of Review’s decision to reject his assertion that he was discharged as a whistle-blower for challenging UnitedHealthcare’s practices and denied him benefits.

  • Published: March 22, 2011
  • Updated: September 15, 2011
  • Comments (0)
Related Topics:

An employee who insulted his supervisor was guilty of willful misconduct and is not entitled to unemployment insurance, a Connecticut appellate court has ruled in upholding a lower court.

According to the decision in Andre Joseph v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act by the Connecticut Appellate Court in Hartford, Joseph began working in 2007 for Minnesota-based United Healthcare Services Inc., now UnitedHealthcare.

In 2008, the company named Debbie Lee as his accounting supervisor. Lee attempted to train Joseph on reconciling accounts on several occasions, but his work continued to be unsatisfactory, according to the March 22 decision.

When his reconciliations were past due because he was unable to complete his work using the methods Lee had ordered, she again sent him an email in January 2009 explaining the methods she wanted him to use.

The plaintiff replied, “You do not have the technical accounting skills to be a supervisor and that will be your downfall.” When Lee responded that she had 20 years of accounting experience, Joseph wrote that “non value added experience non contemporary.”

Joseph was dismissed the same day the emails were exchanged. A referee upheld the dismissal, stating Joseph’s actions constituted “willful misconduct” and he was not entitled to unemployment insurance.

A lower court ruled that Joseph was not entitled to reconsideration of the Employment Security Division Board of Review’s decision to reject his assertion that he was discharged as a whistle-blower for challenging UnitedHealthcare’s practices and denied him benefits.

The appellate court agreed. “The appeals referee concluded, and the board agreed, that the emails that the plaintiff sent to Lee insulted her personally and undermined her supervisory authority and, therefore, his actions rose to the level of willful misconduct in the course of employment. There is sufficient evidence in the record to support this finding,” the court ruled.  

Filed by Judy Greenwald of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

 

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

Follow Workforce on Twitter
HR Jobs
View All Job Listings

Search