Top
Stories
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: Getting Them to Stay February 8, 2013
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: See Where Workers Are Saying 'See Ya' February 8, 2013
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: A Shrinking Pool of Job Candidates February 8, 2013
Featured Article Honoring Diversity the Hawaiian Way February 8, 2013
Featured Article Honoring Diversity the McDonald's Way February 8, 2013
Featured Article Defending Diversity February 8, 2013
Featured Article Retirement Showdown February 7, 2013
Featured Article Visa Program Sparks Debate—Again February 7, 2013
Featured Article Homeward Bound February 7, 2013
Blog: The Practical Employer Workplace Social Media Policies Must Account for Generational Issues February 7, 2013
Blog: Work in Progress Kiss and Tell February 6, 2013
Latest News

Employer Liable Under Jones Act for Worker Shot Aboard Drilling Rig

The shooting occurred in December 2009 when crane operator Keith Beech was off duty and resting on a couch watching television aboard the vessel, according to court records.

  • Published: March 30, 2011
  • Updated: September 15, 2011
  • Comments (0)
Related Topics:

Under the Jones Act, an employer is vicariously liable for the death of an employee killed aboard a drilling vessel when a co-worker’s gun discharged accidentally, a federal judge has ruled.

Even though the employer “clearly delineated” its prohibition against weapons in several forms, including in an employee handbook and in an agreement signed by the owner of the gun, the employer still must pay the deceased worker’s family nearly $1.2 million, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana ruled March 24 in Amanda Beech v. Hercules Drilling Co.

The shooting occurred in December 2009 when crane operator Keith Beech was off-duty and resting on a couch watching television aboard the vessel, according to court records.

While Hercules had argued that Beech was not acting within the course and scope of his employment when he was shot and killed, Judge Carl Barbier called the employer’s argument “unpersuasive.”

The judge ruled that the “course and scope” is a broad employment standard under the Jones Act, which provides a cause of action for negligence involving seamen.

It also found that the gun owner was on duty and “was acting in the course and scope of his employment for purposes of attaching vicarious liability to Hercules under the Jones Act,” according to the ruling. 

Filed by Roberto Ceniceros of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, email editors@workforce.com.

 

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

Follow Workforce on Twitter
HR Jobs
View All Job Listings

Search