Top
Stories
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: Getting Them to Stay February 8, 2013
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: See Where Workers Are Saying 'See Ya' February 8, 2013
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: A Shrinking Pool of Job Candidates February 8, 2013
Featured Article Honoring Diversity the Hawaiian Way February 8, 2013
Featured Article Honoring Diversity the McDonald's Way February 8, 2013
Featured Article Defending Diversity February 8, 2013
Featured Article Retirement Showdown February 7, 2013
Featured Article Visa Program Sparks Debate—Again February 7, 2013
Featured Article Homeward Bound February 7, 2013
Blog: The Practical Employer Workplace Social Media Policies Must Account for Generational Issues February 7, 2013
Blog: Work in Progress Kiss and Tell February 6, 2013
Latest News

Chubb Unit Settles Discrimination, Retaliation Lawsuit

The parties reached an agreement on the case, which was brought in 2010, before a scheduled mediation, resulting in a consent decree that a federal judge in Milwaukee approved on May 3.

  • Published: May 10, 2011
  • Updated: September 15, 2011
  • Comments (0)
Related Topics:

A Chubb Corp. unit has agreed to pay $110,000 to settle a case in which the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission accused it of discrimination and retaliation against a Hmong employee seeking promotion to underwriter.

In a written statement released May 4, the EEOC said Federal Insurance Co., a unit of Warren, New Jersey-based Chubb, refused to promote Kong Chee Vang in its Milwaukee underwriting office because she is Asian.

The EEOC alleged that Chubb failed to stop its managers from using stereotypes and negative assumptions based on race when Vang sought promotion to underwriter in 2006 and 2007.

The EEOC further alleged that after Federal Insurance rejected promoting her in 2006 and Vang filed a complaint with the EEOC accusing the insurer of discrimination, Chubb retaliated against her by rejecting her for a second promotion in 2007.

The parties reached an agreement on the case, which was brought in 2010, before a scheduled mediation, resulting in a consent decree that a federal judge in Milwaukee approved on May 3.

Vang, whose settlement reflects $60,000 in back wages and $50,000 in compensatory damages for emotional distress, continues to work for Chubb, according to the EEOC.

A Chubb spokesman could not be reached for comment.  

Filed by Judy Greenwald of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, email editors@workforce.com.

 

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

 

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

Follow Workforce on Twitter
HR Jobs
View All Job Listings

Search