Top
Stories
Featured Article Retirement Showdown February 7, 2013
Featured Article Visa Program Sparks Debate—Again February 7, 2013
Featured Article Homeward Bound February 7, 2013
Blog: The Practical Employer Workplace Social Media Policies Must Account for Generational Issues February 7, 2013
Blog: Work in Progress Kiss and Tell February 6, 2013
Featured Article Will That Knee Replacement Cost an Arm and a Leg? February 4, 2013
Blog: The Practical Employer How Do You Fight Invisible Discrimination? February 4, 2013
Latest News New Employees: 'We Were Jobbed About This Job' February 1, 2013
Latest News

Judge Dismisses Reporter's Discrimination, Retaliation Case Against Fox News

The EEOC had charged New York City-based Fox News with violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 with respect to its treatment of reporter and former anchor Catherine Herridge.

  • Published: August 31, 2011
  • Updated: September 19, 2011
  • Comments (0)
Related Topics:

Fox News Network has won dismissal of a case in which the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission contended the network violated federal discrimination and retaliation laws in its treatment of a reporter.

The EEOC had charged New York City-based Fox News with violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 with respect to its treatment of reporter and former anchor Catherine Herridge.

The case, which was heard by U.S. District Court Judge Richard Leon in Washington, was Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Fox News Network.

An EEOC investigation resulted in its 2010 determination that Herridge had not been discriminated against personally. The EEOC's investigation, though, did conclude that Fox News had retaliated against Herridge because she opposed discrimination.

The dispute focused on prolonged negotiations for Herridge's 2008-11 contract. It also involved her demand for a five-year contract, rather than the typical three-year contract, among other issues.

However, after a close examination of the record, Leon ruled last week “that no jury could find that Herridge's alleged harms would constitute a materially adverse action in the mind of a reasonable employee.”

Leon also stated that “Herridge's allegations of retaliation, and her eagerness to blame Fox News for delays in salary negotiations, are belied by the persistent and unfeasible demands detailed in the record. Accordingly, a reasonable jury could not infer retaliation from the record and plaintiff's claims must be dismissed.”   

Filed by Judy Greenwald of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, email editors@workforce.com.

 

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management's Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

Follow Workforce on Twitter
HR Jobs
View All Job Listings

Search