Top
Stories
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: Getting Them to Stay February 8, 2013
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: See Where Workers Are Saying 'See Ya' February 8, 2013
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: A Shrinking Pool of Job Candidates February 8, 2013
Featured Article Honoring Diversity the Hawaiian Way February 8, 2013
Featured Article Honoring Diversity the McDonald's Way February 8, 2013
Featured Article Defending Diversity February 8, 2013
Featured Article Retirement Showdown February 7, 2013
Featured Article Visa Program Sparks Debate—Again February 7, 2013
Featured Article Homeward Bound February 7, 2013
Blog: The Practical Employer Workplace Social Media Policies Must Account for Generational Issues February 7, 2013
Blog: Work in Progress Kiss and Tell February 6, 2013
Latest News

DOJ Sues Staffing Agency for Violating Immigration and Nationality Act

The complaint seeks a court order prohibiting future discrimination by the respondent, monetary damages to the employee and civil penalties.

  • Comments (0)
Related Topics:

The Justice Department has filed a lawsuit against a staffing agency, charging it with firing a worker for objecting to the firm's preference for hiring foreign nationals with temporary work visas to American citizens.

According to a statement issued by the DOJ on May 22, the complaint charges Jersey City, New Jersey-based Whiz International L.L.C., an information technology staffing company, with violating the antidiscrimination provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act when it terminated the employee in retaliation for expressing opposition to the firm's alleged preference for hiring foreign nationals with temporary work visas to U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents.

The Act's antidiscrimination provision prohibits employers from retaliating against workers who oppose a practice that is illegal under the statute, or who attempt to assert rights under the statute, according to the DOJ.

The complaint seeks a court order prohibiting future discrimination by the respondent, monetary damages to the employee and civil penalties, according to the department's statement, which did not identify the employee beyond stating she had served as a receptionist and recruiter.

Thomas E. Perez, assistant attorney general for the DOJ's civil rights division, said in the statement, "Employers cannot punish employees who try to do the right thing and take reasonable measures to shed light on a practice they believe may be discriminatory. Employers must ensure that their practices conform to the antidiscrimination provisions of the INA and retaliation will not be tolerated."

A company spokesman could not be reached for comment.

Judy Greenwald writes for Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, email editors@workforce.com.

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management's Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

Follow Workforce on Twitter
HR Jobs
View All Job Listings

Search