Top
Stories
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: Getting Them to Stay February 8, 2013
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: See Where Workers Are Saying 'See Ya' February 8, 2013
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: A Shrinking Pool of Job Candidates February 8, 2013
Featured Article Honoring Diversity the Hawaiian Way February 8, 2013
Featured Article Honoring Diversity the McDonald's Way February 8, 2013
Featured Article Defending Diversity February 8, 2013
Featured Article Retirement Showdown February 7, 2013
Featured Article Visa Program Sparks Debate—Again February 7, 2013
Featured Article Homeward Bound February 7, 2013
Blog: The Practical Employer Workplace Social Media Policies Must Account for Generational Issues February 7, 2013
Blog: Work in Progress Kiss and Tell February 6, 2013
Latest News

Employer Not Obligated to Rehire Poor-Performing Worker Under USERRA: Court

An employer is not obligated to rehire a returning veteran with a poor work performance who was terminated as part of a reduction in force, under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act.

  • Comments (0)
Related Topics:

An employer is not obligated under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act to rehire a returning veteran with a poor work performance who was terminated as part of a reduction in force, said an appellate court Dec. 5.

According to the ruling by the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis in Douglas Milhauser v. Minco Products Inc., Milhauser, a maintenance technician whose work performance was considered to be "inconsistent and sometimes poor," was included among those terminated as part of a reduction in force at his Fridley, Minnesota-based firm. As a result, he was dismissed when he reported for work after his military service had concluded in June 2009.

Milhauser sued, charging the company with discrimination on the basis of military service and with failure to provide re-employment as required by USERRA. A jury ruled in Minco's favor on both counts, and Milhauser appealed on the USERRA issue.

The appellate court said under USERRA, employees returning from military leave must be re-employed in the "position of employment in which they would have been employed" had their continuous employment not been interrupted by military service, which is known as the escalator principle.

"Milhauser asserts that termination cannot be a 'position of employment' under USERRA," said the appellate court.

Jury finding consistent with USERRA text

But a three-judge panel disagreed: "The jury's finding that Milhauser' s position of employment would have been termination had he not left for military service is entirely consistent with USERRA's text and its implementing regulations," said the court, in affirming the lower court's judgment."

"The Secretary of Labor's regulations on USERRA confirm that the escalator principle may properly be applied to result in an employee's termination … We accord considerable deference to the Secretary's interpretation" because she is charged with implementing USERRA's provisions, said the court, which also stated other courts' rulings agree.

Experts have said complying with the broadly worded USERRA can be a challenge for employers.

Judy Greenwald writes for Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com.

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management's Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

Follow Workforce on Twitter
HR Jobs
View All Job Listings

Search