News in Brief
Home
Complete archive of features and news articles, sample policies and procedures, assessments, and surveys.
Network and exchange ideas with other members in the forums or ask an expert in one of the hosted forums.
Access vendor directories, product case studies and showcases.
Read Best in Shows, view our conference calendar, read commentaries and take our news poll.
The Hot List
Blogs
Topic Channels
Comp, Benefits, Rewards
HR Management
Legal Insight
Recruiting and Staffing
Software and Technology
Training and Development
= Member Only
Workforce HR Jobs
Post Your Job
Post Your Resume



Subscribe Now
Workforce Magazine
Subscriber Help
























= Member Only


News in Brief: Apportioning Workers’ Compensation on Age Is Discriminatory
  

Apportioning Workers’ Compensation on Age Is Discriminatory
Workers’ compensation benefits cannot be apportioned for age and the practice runs afoul of state antidiscrimination laws, California’s 3rd District Court of Appeals has ruled.
December 5, 2007
Apportioning Workers’ Compensation on Age Is Discriminatory
Apportioning for age runs afoul of state antidiscrimination laws, California’s 3rd District Court of Appeals has ruled.
 
Workers’ compensation benefits cannot be apportioned for age, a California appeals court ruled Monday, December 3, in an unpublished case.

Apportioning for age runs afoul of state antidiscrimination laws, California’s 3rd District Court of Appeals ruled in Lois Vaira v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board and California Travel and Tourism Commission et al.

Vaira, 73, injured her back in 2003 while working for the tourism commission, court records show. A medical examiner concluded that the claimant’s age and pre-existing osteopenia, or osteoporosis, contributed to a resulting disability.

The medical examiner apportioned 40 percent of her disability to her pre-existing conditions and 60 percent to the work injury. A workers’ compensation judge and an appeals board adjusted her disability award down accordingly, court records show. She was awarded more than $51,000 in permanent disability benefits after the adjustment.

The appeals court in Sacramento, California, however, overturned the workers’ compensation board’s findings, which found that apportionment for osteoporosis does not reflect an age bias. But the appeals court remanded the case because of age bias.

Filed by Roberto Ceniceros of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

 


News in Brief Archive



Similar Documents

Related Topics









Copyright © 1995-2008 Crain Communications Inc.
All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement